Incidence and predictors of definite stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Coronary stents are widely used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. We aimed to explore the incidence, predictors and characteristics of stent thrombosis (ST) after coronary stent implantation in routine clinical practice.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From data of 18 063 consecutive patients who underwent successful stent implantation in Shenyang Northern Hospital from 2004 to 2010, we identified patients with definite ST (n = 140) and control patients (n = 280) matched on age, diagnosis, sex, current antiplatelet medication and stent type. The incidence, predictors and characteristics of ST after coronary stent implantation were investigated.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The incidence of angiographically confirmed ST was 0.78% (140/18 063). The time distribution of ST was acute in 43 (30.7%), subacute in 50 (35.7%), and late in 47 (33.6%) patients. Binary Logistic regression analysis identied the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) (odds ratio (OR) = 0.472, 95%CI: 0.276 - 0.807, P = 0.006) and heparin (OR = 0.477, 95%CI: 0.278 - 0.819, P = 0.007) were associated with an reduced risk of cumulative ST. Stent length (OR = 1.042, 95%CI: 1.026 - 1.058, P < 0.001), serum creatinine total (OR = 1.020, 95%CI: 1.004 - 1.035, P = 0.04), cholesterol (OR = 1.267, 95%CI: 1.021 - 1.573, P = 0.032), glucose (OR = 1.086, 95%CI: 1.002 - 1.176, P = 0.044), and platelet aggregation (OR = 1.113, 95%CI: 1.075 - 1.154, P < 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of cumulative ST.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>ST is associated with longer stent length and higher level of total cholesterol, glucose and platelet aggregation.</p>

Effects of intensive antiplatelet therapy for patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity after coronary stent implantation / 中华心血管病杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the effects of intensive antiplatelet therapy for patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) after coronary stent implantation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Between March 2009 and February 2011, a total of 3316 consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implanting from 3 hospitals were enrolled. Among them, 840 patients (25.3%) were identified as HPR (defined as 20 µmol/L adenosine diphosphate induced platelet aggregation of ≥ 55% at 24 hours after administration of 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose and 300 mg aspirin). The HPR patients were randomly assigned to receive standard (aspirin 300 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d, n = 280) or intensified (n = 560) antiplatelet therapy by the ratio of 1:2. Patients in the intensive group were initially treated with a double maintenance dose of clopidogrel (150 mg/d) and aspirin (300 mg/d). After 3 days, patients with unsolved HPR received additional cilostazol treatment (50 - 100 mg, bid). The reversion rate of HPR and clinical events were observed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the intensive group, HPR reversed in 304 out of 560 patients (54.3%) at 3 days post therapy and the remaining 256 patients with HPR were treated with additional cilostazol regimen for another 3 days and the total reversion rate of HPR was 81.1% (454/560). The reversion rate of HPR at 30 days in the intensified group was significantly higher than that of the standard group (69.9% vs. 55.7%, P = 0.000). At 30 days after percutaneous coronary intervention, 1 patient suffered from subacute stent thrombosis (0.2%) in intensified group and no stent thrombosis was observed in standard group (P = 1.000). There were no death, major or minor bleeding in both two groups. Minimal bleeding was also similar in the two groups (intensive: 4.28% vs. standard: 2.14%, P = 0.166).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The intensified antiplatelet therapy regimens could significantly increase the reversion rate of HPR in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing coronary stenting without increasing the risk of bleeding. The clinic impact of this strategy needs to be elucidated by long term follow-up outcome studies.</p>

Comparison of drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents implantation for the treatment of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: 2-year clinical outcomes from single-center registry / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Some larger scale, randomized studies have demonstrated the superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate the impact of DES, in comparison with BMS, on the 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2002 to December 2008, a total of 1301 consecutive STEMI patients treated with coronary stenting in Shenyang Northern Hospital were prospectively registered. Patients received BMS (n = 868) or DES (n = 435) implantation in the infarction related artery according to physician's discretion. A propensity score analysis was performed and two well matched subgroups were selected (BMS, n = 288; DES, n = 288) to evaluate the 2-year clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Survival salvage analysis showed that 2-year cumulative hazards were not significantly different between the two groups with respect to TVR (2.8% vs. 3.1%, log-rank P = 0.780), stent thrombosis (1.7% vs. 4.2%, log-rank P = 0.079) and MACE (8% vs. 10.8%, log-rank P = 0.236). Multivariate analysis showed that DES was an independent protective factor of MI (HR: 0.211, 95%CI: 0.049 to 0.908) and stent thrombosis (HR: 0.327, 95%CI: 0.107 to 0.994).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>DES was associated with similar 2-year clinical outcomes to those of BMS for the treatment of STEMI in daily practice.</p>